How to Prevent Micromanagement in the Workplace

     

How to Prevent Micromanagement in the Workplace

Employees who trust their supervisors trust them to perform their jobs well, In a positive atmosphere. Autonomy is valued by team members, which can improve morale and stimulate creativity. Left unchecked, micromanaging the business can have the opposite effect.  It can reduce productivity and increase turnover. Now is the time to intervene if you believe staff members are feeling micromanaged. Supporting managers to adopt a more effective approach can improve team morale and organizational culture.

Micromanaging mean

Although there is no clear definition of micromanagement, it generally refers to a management approach that closely monitors what employees are doing. Instead of focusing on deterministic objectives, micromanagers become unduly concerned with the specifics of each project; As a means of managing staff they need regular updates and activity impacts at every stage. Micromanagers have little faith and trust in their employees. They believe that by keeping an eye on each assignment and providing feedback, they can influence the outcome. How micromanaging affects employees

Micromanaging may increase employee output in the short-term, but over time, they may become discouraged and disempowered.

Both employee productivity and mental health can suffer from this management approach. Highly esteemed individuals may experience excessive anxiety and self-doubt; They begin to internalize the manager's mistrust. Workers with high self-esteem are more likely to experience anger or frustration. They will eventually realize that management never appreciates their skills or accepts their suggestions. At that point, they may feel down and lethargic.

The way of recognize micromanagement

Below steps can be recognized if employees have to deal with micromanaging within the workplace

Observe the managers and employees

Company managers pay special attention to how they interact with their team members. If you observe that they often stimulate open communication and collective brainstorming, you will have a manager who uses their leadership skills well. If the boss is seen as restricting the free exchange of ideas and obsessing over small things, they may be micromanaging.

Staff responses may include clues. Are they passive or inattentive in meetings? Do they exchange meaningful looks with each other? When the manager enters the room, does the conversation end? Any of these could be indicators of micromanagement.

Review the managers’ reports

Analyze each management's reporting practices. If they create an unusually large number of performance appraisals, especially if the majority of the input is negative, they may be dealing with a micromanager.

Occasional staff reviews are helpful, but continuous reporting without encouraging feedback inevitably reduces productivity.

Deciding workforce are processing

Management can blame your employees if they are not making progress. Trying and learning new things can be difficult for those working with micromanagers. To maintain their level of control over certain tasks and duties, micromanagers often keep their information to themselves. A manager who fosters employee development can even act as a mentor to lower-level employees in a positive work environment. Effective managers encourage their staff to perform to the best of their ability.

Take note of innovation

If innovation is not allowed in the organization, it is imperative to find out how leaders respond to fresh ideas. Do they listen to suggestions from team members or do they ignore them? Micromanagers often stifle creativity because they rarely respond to original ideas or alternative viewpoints. Constant supervision by a micromanager can stifle innovation, as some of the best ideas may come from staff members who have time to sit down and consider alternatives.

How to prevent micromanaging within the workplace

If begin to see evidence of micromanagement in the workplace, urgent action is necessary. Set up a meeting with management to question and share ideas. Highlighting specific examples of micromanagement will help talk about how to improve the workplace. It's reasonable to expect some resistance to this discussion, especially if the manager thrives on control. If their behavior is motivated by a sincere desire to help, Management may find that they are more receptive to learning how to stop micromanaging. Regardless of the rationale, it is important to clarify that the manager's role is to promote the overall goals of the organization. They don't have to worry about the minor details of the organization. Remind them that their responsibility is to provide support, guidance and leadership to their team.

Key Benefits of eliminating micromanagement

Employees may experience a loss of autonomy at work as a result of micromanagement. Everyone benefits when action is taken to foster more freedom and less regulation. Many advantages include:

High Retention: Everyone likes to be appreciated, and treating staff well and considering their thoughts makes them feel more important at work. Employees are more likely to stay loyal to your business when they respect and value their management.

 Better culture and morale: Workers who feel in charge of their jobs often feel better about it. This enthusiastic vibe can spread among all staff members and uplift the workplace environment..

Increased productivity: Employees have a greater chance of being productive when management is not constantly expecting progress updates. Also, it gives managers more time to focus on big picture goals and team building.

Tips to prevent micromanagement

It is very important to root out micro-management quickly if any opportunity is seen in the company. Establishing a more enthusiastic and productive workplace culture requires working with supervisors to:

Rust workers. Project objectives and duties are communicated by great managers who take a step back. Workers do not need to be watched as long as they are doing their jobs. If output declines, managers can talk to staff about expectations and ask for feedback.

Offer stimulating ideas. Managers should generally provide a mixture of constructive and critical criticism. Positive feedback encourages employees to improve and constructive criticism encourages them to learn from their mistakes.

Providing opportunities for education. Employees are better able to support the business' projects and initiatives when they are given the opportunity to develop new skills. Managers can help by organizing training sessions, sponsoring professional development programs or assigning new duties.

Assume joint accountability for organizational goals. By encouraging open company-wide communication, the burden on managers can be reduced and micromanagement can be avoided. Hold frequent meetings to go over company goals, and give all employees the tools they need to succeed.

 Allow promotion for workers. Provide a workplace structure that allows employees at all levels to take on more responsibility. Distributing authority among staff members can prevent one boss from having too much power over the workplace.

Set clear rules. An environment with too many rules encourages micromanagement. Instead, follow a set of clear, simple principles that everyone can understand. This gives workers the freedom and autonomy they need to be accountable and creative.

Conclusion 

Micro-managing is not a very good concept, micro-managing everything is not a very good idea, it limits what the team can do as well as the ability of individuals to develop and evolve.

If there's a good chance a supervisor gets away with micromanaging, they can delegate, prioritize, and encourage employees to take initiative rather than the big picture. It is important for the supervisor to understand that there is a better way of doing things if an organization is being micromanaged. In this case, organizations can get benefits separately through micro-management, ie, High Retention, Better culture and morale,  Increased productivity is used for this.



Reference

Allcorn, S., 2022. Micromanagement in the workplace. Organisational and Social Dynamics22(1), pp.83-98.

Bobinski, D., 2009. Creating passion-driven teams: How to stop micromanaging and motivate people to top performance. Red Wheel/Weiser.

Chambers, H.E., 2009. My way or the highway: The micromanagement survival guide (Vol. 13). ReadHowYouWant. com.

Delgado, O., Strauss, E.M. and Ortega, M.A., 2015. Micromanagement: When to avoid it and how to use it effectively. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy72(10), pp.772-776.

Tripp, T.M. and Bies, R.J., 2009. Getting even: The truth about workplace revenge--and how to stop it. John Wiley & Sons.

White Jr, R.D., 2010. The micromanagement disease: Symptoms, diagnosis, and cure. Public Personnel Management39(1), pp.71-76.


Comments

  1. Micromanagement can have a negatively affect employee morale, company culture, and employee turnover. “It doesn't make sense to hire smart people and then tell them what to to , We hire smart people so they can tell us what to do.” (Steve jobs)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. George Bertus thank you for your valuable comments, The concept of micromanagement has been executed in many organizations in different ways, here as you mention micromanagement harms the business in many ways,
      especially micromanagement leads to leaving talents away from business, and then we can't get the maximum output from the employees because of their poor morale, On the other hand, most of the younger generation prefer to work with freedom rather than follow-up.

      Delete
  2. Employees feel bosses trust them to perform their jobs efficiently in a positive work environment. Team members benefit from a feeling of autonomy that can improve morale and foster innovation. Workplace micromanagement has the opposite impact; if left unchecked, it can lower productivity and increase turnover. Good Article !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tharanga Jayasundara, thank you for your comment, you highlight the most important points on micromanagement.
      Here micromanagement leads to discouraging the innovation of the business, today many authors highlighted the importance of innovative and high-performance culture for gaining success.
      here micromanagement is the opposite side of it. On the other hand, there is a positive and significant association between company productivity and morale,
      however, micromanagement directly impacts on reduces employee morale, and, poor morale significantly impacts reduced productivity.

      Delete
  3. Creating a positive work environment with clear communication, trust, and delegation can go a long way in preventing micromanagement in the workplace. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tharanga Wanigasundara, thank you for your comment, you highlight how to prevent micromanagement and what are the ways for minimizing it.
      As you mention creating a positive work environment is the opposite side of micromanagement.
      Here delegation of work among subordinates gives freedom, autonomy, and ownership of the duties, trust leads to building good morale and a dedicated workforce, which leads to enhanced productivity, gaining competitive advantages. finally, the company can make sure long-term sustainability with a highly motivated workforce.

      Delete
  4. Employee performance may be temporarily increased by micromanaging, but over time, they risk becoming demotivated and powerless. an interesting article.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dhanushka Jayanath, thank you for your comments, and I agree with your point, micromanagement leads to enhancing temporary performance with continuous unnecessary follow-up,
    however, this performance enhancement is short-term and temporary, and not healthy, because people don't have mental freedom, morale, or autonomy for work. then their stress, commitment, and satisfaction gradually decreased, and then most of the talents decide to leave the organization, which negatively impacts on productivity and competitiveness

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The role of Artificial intelligent on Human resource management

Lean management

Impact of Disruptive Technologies to Employee Engagement